Sunday, May 30, 2010

C.S.A.: An Evil Regime


I posit these statements as facts:

• The Civil War began when the southern states established the Confederate States of America. While the areas of disagreement between the regions may have been manifold, the most compelling factor was that the entire economy of the South was based on an agriculture system that depended on slave labor for its profitability. When the first Republican president was elected on a platform to prohibit slavery’s expansion into new states, slave state leaders were alarmed that they would soon lose their stalemate in the Senate and the United States would soon be on the slippery slope to prohibition. Secession was a preemptive move to maintain the pro-slavery status quo.

• Many scholars believe that Lincoln personally supported abolition but as a practical politician could not do it universally by edict. Yes, there are a couple of asterisks that need to be applied but the Emancipation Proclamation was a momentous document that had to be supplemented with the 13th and 14th Amendments. Even so, it took another century for Black Americans to be given equal rights of citizenship. Of course, things like the GOP’s voter suppression efforts continue to work counter to this ideal.

• Abolitionists existed in the South. Most Whites in the North had views that would be considered quite racist today. Many were indifferent to the slavery issue. Any analysis of the people of the two “nations” would not find that either population to be morally superior to the other.

• There can be no similar equivalence offered for the two regimes that were at war. The CSA waged a brutal war against the United States. Its officers betrayed their oaths of loyalty to the USA. While the U.S. Constitution was silent on the issue of slavery (silence infers consent?), the C.S. Constitution was quite explicit in guaranteeing support for the peculiar institution.

• If the goals of Reconstruction had been adhered to, if the promise of 40 acres and a mule had been honored, America would have reached racial reconciliation a hundred years sooner. (not that we’re there yet, BTW).

• At some point late in the 19th Century Americans made a grand bargain. We would honor the heroes from both sides of the conflict. Southerners would cling to the wistful melancholy of their beloved lost cause and we all* could get back to being one American people again.

• The price for this bargain was paid by African Americans. When federal troops withdrew, former slaves lost their franchise along with the rest of their civil rights. They were subjected to brutally enforced codes and random acts of domestic terrorism. This created, in functional terms, the reinstitution of slavery. [recommended reading: Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II http://www.amazon.com/Slavery-Another-Name-Re-Enslavement-Americans/dp/0385722702 ]

It is right to celebrate southern people and their culture. Those who died in their war against the United States are to be afforded our respect and honor. However, I will not pretend that the Confederate States was somehow benign. It was an evil regime created to perpetuate the peculiar institution of slavery. Its symbols became tools which were used to enforce the subjugation of African people well into the 20th Century. It may cause discomfort among good people in the 21st Century, but this is something that can never be sugarcoated.

*all the White people, that is.

Monday, May 3, 2010

Drugs, Immigration and "Papers, Please"

There are two distinct problems –somewhat related but hardly synonymous– that accrue from our inability to control the flow of goods and services across our border with Mexico. The free market demand placed by Americans for drugs and cheaper labor frustrates even our most effective efforts to limit access into the USA. (This is not to claim that our efforts thus far are as effective as they may be; it is just that even the very best programs will never enjoy very high rates of success, ultimately.) It is the folly born of one’s refusal to recognize the raw power of the market that marks socialists, communists and ultra-nationalist xenophobes as ineffectual dreamers who would presume to bend human behavior to transform it into something more to their liking.

Those who are drawn across the border in search of a better standard of living for their families are NOT the same as the remorseless murderers who glibly administer mayhem and terror in their efforts to secure a greater market share of the U.S. recreational drug market. As we search for solutions to both of these problems, it is dishonest and immoral to conflate them. It is not yet known who killed rancher Robert Krentz in SW Arizona but it is absurd to think that he was most likely murdered by a band of wanna-be day laborers.

See Daily Kos article: “Catalyst for Hateful Arizona Law Had Little to do with Immigration Issue”

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Join the American Progressive Party


Jesus Iscariot


But His Birth Certificate Says: "MARLBORO COUNTRY"


The Great Fake of 2008


Someone in the conservative bloggosphere flipped a photo of then-Senator Obama and photoshopped a cigarette between his lips. Presumably, this made him seem sinister and unsavory but others think it makes him come across as a 50s era hepcat; a connoisseur(or even a player) of bebop jazz who just finished a set with Miles and Bird.

Note also that the cigarette is approximately 125% larger than normal. Scale is always the photoshopper's curse.

It IS the Moral Equivalent of War


HOW'S THAT DRILLY-SPILLY THING?


HOLD the DANDY DON ACCOUNTABLE


May I See Your Papers, Please?


SIGNIFICANT RESTRICTIONS APPLY


ARIZONA: The View from the Other Side